In our last trip to Spain, we somehow strung together a series of cities along the Camino Francรฉs (or French Way, in English) of Camino de Santiago (or Way of St. James, in English), Burgos being one of them. One thing leading to another, I found myself on a mental journey searching for the meaning of pilgrimage.
In my mind, itโs obvious when thereโs a church involved, especially done with the safety of many others around you.
Or, going it alone, even if it means taking a break from the group for the sake of clear air and clear mind, would cut it.
If we stretch a little and take a liberal interpretation, standing afar and staring into the grandiose monument could provide much-needed enlightenment as well.
Unfortunately, this belief system came to a halt when I read that a pilgrim is "always in danger of becoming a tourist" by the Christian priest Frank Fahey. He writes in Pilgrims or Tourists? โPilgrimage โฆ is more about the journey than the destination. This may seem a contradiction to a modern pilgrim who flies off to a distant shrine or holy city, eager to arrive there to see as much as possibleโ.
All of a sudden, the concept of pilgrimage seem more relevant to me. For someone that doesnโt tally up the number of countries visited and is silly enough to visit certain countries multiple times (what a waste) while skipping certain others, could she be a pilgrim in this life on earth?
As a practitioner of substance over form (thanks to the professional training in my โprevious lifeโ), I seem to agree that "a pilgrimage is a journey ... where a person goes in search of new or expanded meaning about their self, others, nature, or a higher good, through the experience." (per Wikipedia)
What do you think? Am I a pilgrim? Are you?